Apparently quite a bit. I never got around to the follow-up piece I promised on Dr. Russell Blaylock, and I’m not sure I can do him justice, given how densely he packs in the bullshit, but here it goes…

The opening page of his website reads like a roster of denialism, quackery, and crankism. In the first few inches, titles of articles read, “Vaccines can kill”, “Cholesterol drugs are dangerous”, “Why fluoride is toxic”, and some other great ones like “Stop aging”.

We can examine some of those claims, but let’s examine the messenger a bit first.

Who is this guy, and who likes him?

As stated in my first post on the man, he believably claims to have graduated from medical school and done a residency in neurosurgery. He seems to be trying to piggyback an awful lot of general credibility on his early, very specific work, creating a penumbra of “expert-ness” that is unjustified. That being said, who, besides Blaylock himself, takes him seriously?

The Weston Price Foundation

These folks reportedly have given Blaylock their 2004 Integrity in Science Award. Coming from a foundation that bases it’s mission on the odd nutritional ideas of a single individual, this is a dubious honor. They must be on the cutting edge because they’re into raw milk! They support an incoherent range of fringe nutritional issues, including the assertion that high serum cholesterol is not associated with increased mortality. Hey, I love meat, but reading their site makes me wonder if Weston Price was invented by a bunch of ranchers.

Life Extension Foundation

Blaylock sits on the “advisory board” (damn, I love those “scare quotes”!) of this organization. Their website appears to be an ad factory for nutritional supplements. They do say they are not-for-profit, however. But, hey, I just have to quote this, in honor of Walt Disney and Ted Williams:

The long-term goal of The Foundation’s low-temperature research program is the development of human suspended animation, which will enable physicians to transport dying patients through time for treatment by the super-advanced medical scientists of the future.

I love science fiction as much as the next nerd, but as a real doctor, I’d rather focus on the real and marvelous treatments that we already have, rather than offering my sick patients the “corpsicle” option.

JPANDS???

Yes, he admits to being an associate editor of the Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons, the official publication of the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons. ‘Nuf said.

Nutraceuticals

Blaylock is reportedly an editor of the Journal of the American Nutraceutical Association, “recognized” by Quackwatch. Since “nutraceutical” is not really a scientifically accepted concept in the first place, I’m not sure why he would want his name anywhere near them. Volume 10(2)2007 of JANA (the free sample available online) does not contain a single piece of original research as far as I can tell. It is more of a newsletter than a journal.

Newsmax and the Wellness Report

Newsmax, a conservative news organization with at least some legitimacy, publishes “The Blaylock Wellness Report”. I am not a journalist, so please forgive me for wondering what possible advantages a conservative news outlet could gain from publishing the rantings of a crank denialist. Perhaps someone with more experience might know. Either way, the Report is a denialist’s nocturnal emission. As stated above, it basically repeats every denialist canard imaginable from the “dangers” of fluoridated water, to “killer” vaccines. Lets get move in a little closer and, um, flesh this out a bit.

I don’t know if the dewooificator can stand too much of this. The engines, Captain, they can’t take it!

He first repeats the usual canards, including the horrible fact that the number of childhood vaccinations has grown since the 50s! He fails to mention that the death rates of vaccine-preventable childhood illnesses has tanked.

He fills is rant with calm, useful statements like:

Vaccines are even being promoted for newborns, often for diseases that pose no risk to children. The greatest danger is the vaccines themselves.

And the examples and evidence to support this bold claim is…well, absent (of course, you can buy the “report” through Newsmax. What’s 54 bucks a year compared to …(hey, that’s a lot of lattes. Forget it.) Wait…maybe I am beginning to understand Newsmax’s role here. Every news organization needs a few stable advertisers to keep afloat.

That’s it. I’m spent. The bottom of the vaccine page is full of sales pitches. Has this man no shame?

Nope.